From bugzilla at busybox.net Wed Sep 6 09:04:31 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:04:31 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15757] New: udhcpc: unicast renew fails sporadically
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15757
Bug ID: 15757
Summary: udhcpc: unicast renew fails sporadically
Product: Busybox
Version: 1.34.x
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Networking
Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net
Reporter: json.wago at gmail.com
CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 9631
--> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=9631&action=edit
config
When using busybox udhcpc in combination with OpenDHCP server, its sometimes
observed that udhcpc fails to handle/recognize the ACK for the unicast REQUEST
(renew).
The following broadcast renew is handled successfully. This behavior is not
observed when using a different dhcp-server like dnsmasq or isc-dhcp-server.
The unhandled dhcp ACK is seen on the interface that udhpc is listening on (via
tcpdump).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Wed Sep 6 09:06:55 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:06:55 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15757] udhcpc: unicast renew fails sporadically
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15757
--- Comment #1 from json.wago at gmail.com ---
Created attachment 9634
--> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=9634&action=edit
pcap of the failed dhcp renew
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Thu Sep 7 18:29:46 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 18:29:46 +0000
Subject: [Bug 14401] The unzip Binary is from older version which has
security vulnerabilities.
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14401
--- Comment #1 from clausstrommer at geotab.com ---
Vulnerability scans still identify Busybox's unzip version as 4.1.0. Is this
accurate, and if so is there any plan to update the version?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Fri Sep 8 09:16:55 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:16:55 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15763] New: memory leakage even if ENABLE_FEATURE_CLEAN_UP is
enabled, because INIT_G will call xzalloc, but no FINI_G is implemented and
called while exit
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15763
Bug ID: 15763
Summary: memory leakage even if ENABLE_FEATURE_CLEAN_UP is
enabled, because INIT_G will call xzalloc, but no
FINI_G is implemented and called while exit
Product: Busybox
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net
Reporter: vsfos at qq.com
CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net
Target Milestone: ---
As the topic, I found many commands has such issuce, example hush.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Mon Sep 11 21:45:14 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:45:14 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15769] New: critical wget regression in 1.36.x
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15769
Bug ID: 15769
Summary: critical wget regression in 1.36.x
Product: Busybox
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Networking
Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net
Reporter: ed at reshape.de
CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net
Target Milestone: ---
Since 1.36.x every wget call results in an error:
wget: bad port 'http'
Reverting to 1.35.x resolves the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Tue Sep 12 06:20:15 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 06:20:15 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15751] `time` function reports more `maxrss` usage than GNU time
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15751
herano1999 at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P5 |P3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Tue Sep 12 15:18:00 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:18:00 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15769] critical wget regression in 1.36.x
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15769
--- Comment #1 from Erik Dannenberg ---
oph and its a static compile against musl if that makes any difference
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Thu Sep 21 00:10:28 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:10:28 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15781] New: Need support for -E option in awk
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15781
Bug ID: 15781
Summary: Need support for -E option in awk
Product: Busybox
Version: 1.35.x
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net
Reporter: philipp at redfish-solutions.com
CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net
Target Milestone: ---
When embedding a script in a file as "#!/usr/bin/awk -f", awk will hungrily
consume anything that looks like an flag, hiding them from the script itself.
The -E option allows the embedded script to see the flags that were passed on
the command line, so that the script itself might have some flag processing
ability.
Otherwise, one always has to invoke the script with "-- flags... options..."
instead which is ugly and counter-intuitive; and if you're rewriting an
existing script from another language (say 'sh') into awk, this breaks
transparency/compatibility.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Thu Sep 21 13:12:34 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:12:34 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15784] New: implement fullblock flag support for dd
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15784
Bug ID: 15784
Summary: implement fullblock flag support for dd
Product: Busybox
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net
Reporter: ivan.sorokin.tech at gmail.com
CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net
Target Milestone: ---
Hello!
I am working on FISH
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Files_transferred_over_shell_protocol) protocol
implementation for Far Manager Linux port
(https://github.com/elfmz/far2l/issues/1819).
For the protocol to work reliably, support for the "fullblock" option of the dd
command is necessary, as it is done in GNU dd. If this is possible, please add
support for this option. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Fri Sep 22 11:18:55 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:18:55 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15784] implement fullblock flag support for dd
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15784
Ivan Sorokin changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Ivan Sorokin ---
According to the changelog, dd iflag=fullblock was introduced into busybox
relatively long ago:
1 July 2018 -- BusyBox 1.29.0 (unstable)
Nicholas Clark:
dd: add 'fullblock' iflag
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
From bugzilla at busybox.net Mon Sep 25 06:21:22 2023
From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net)
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 06:21:22 +0000
Subject: [Bug 15751] `time` function reports more `maxrss` usage than GNU time
In-Reply-To:
References:
Message-ID:
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15751
herano1999 at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Priority|P3 |P1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.