From bugzilla at busybox.net Wed Sep 6 09:04:31 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:04:31 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15757] New: udhcpc: unicast renew fails sporadically Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15757 Bug ID: 15757 Summary: udhcpc: unicast renew fails sporadically Product: Busybox Version: 1.34.x Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Networking Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net Reporter: json.wago at gmail.com CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9631 --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=9631&action=edit config When using busybox udhcpc in combination with OpenDHCP server, its sometimes observed that udhcpc fails to handle/recognize the ACK for the unicast REQUEST (renew). The following broadcast renew is handled successfully. This behavior is not observed when using a different dhcp-server like dnsmasq or isc-dhcp-server. The unhandled dhcp ACK is seen on the interface that udhpc is listening on (via tcpdump). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Wed Sep 6 09:06:55 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2023 09:06:55 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15757] udhcpc: unicast renew fails sporadically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15757 --- Comment #1 from json.wago at gmail.com --- Created attachment 9634 --> https://bugs.busybox.net/attachment.cgi?id=9634&action=edit pcap of the failed dhcp renew -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Thu Sep 7 18:29:46 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 18:29:46 +0000 Subject: [Bug 14401] The unzip Binary is from older version which has security vulnerabilities. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=14401 --- Comment #1 from clausstrommer at geotab.com --- Vulnerability scans still identify Busybox's unzip version as 4.1.0. Is this accurate, and if so is there any plan to update the version? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Fri Sep 8 09:16:55 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 09:16:55 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15763] New: memory leakage even if ENABLE_FEATURE_CLEAN_UP is enabled, because INIT_G will call xzalloc, but no FINI_G is implemented and called while exit Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15763 Bug ID: 15763 Summary: memory leakage even if ENABLE_FEATURE_CLEAN_UP is enabled, because INIT_G will call xzalloc, but no FINI_G is implemented and called while exit Product: Busybox Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Other Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net Reporter: vsfos at qq.com CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net Target Milestone: --- As the topic, I found many commands has such issuce, example hush. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Mon Sep 11 21:45:14 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 21:45:14 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15769] New: critical wget regression in 1.36.x Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15769 Bug ID: 15769 Summary: critical wget regression in 1.36.x Product: Busybox Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Networking Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net Reporter: ed at reshape.de CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net Target Milestone: --- Since 1.36.x every wget call results in an error: wget: bad port 'http' Reverting to 1.35.x resolves the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Tue Sep 12 06:20:15 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 06:20:15 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15751] `time` function reports more `maxrss` usage than GNU time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15751 herano1999 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P5 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Tue Sep 12 15:18:00 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:18:00 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15769] critical wget regression in 1.36.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15769 --- Comment #1 from Erik Dannenberg --- oph and its a static compile against musl if that makes any difference -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Thu Sep 21 00:10:28 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:10:28 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15781] New: Need support for -E option in awk Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15781 Bug ID: 15781 Summary: Need support for -E option in awk Product: Busybox Version: 1.35.x Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Other Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net Reporter: philipp at redfish-solutions.com CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net Target Milestone: --- When embedding a script in a file as "#!/usr/bin/awk -f", awk will hungrily consume anything that looks like an flag, hiding them from the script itself. The -E option allows the embedded script to see the flags that were passed on the command line, so that the script itself might have some flag processing ability. Otherwise, one always has to invoke the script with "-- flags... options..." instead which is ugly and counter-intuitive; and if you're rewriting an existing script from another language (say 'sh') into awk, this breaks transparency/compatibility. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Thu Sep 21 13:12:34 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 13:12:34 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15784] New: implement fullblock flag support for dd Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15784 Bug ID: 15784 Summary: implement fullblock flag support for dd Product: Busybox Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Other Assignee: unassigned at busybox.net Reporter: ivan.sorokin.tech at gmail.com CC: busybox-cvs at busybox.net Target Milestone: --- Hello! I am working on FISH (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Files_transferred_over_shell_protocol) protocol implementation for Far Manager Linux port (https://github.com/elfmz/far2l/issues/1819). For the protocol to work reliably, support for the "fullblock" option of the dd command is necessary, as it is done in GNU dd. If this is possible, please add support for this option. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Fri Sep 22 11:18:55 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 11:18:55 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15784] implement fullblock flag support for dd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15784 Ivan Sorokin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Ivan Sorokin --- According to the changelog, dd iflag=fullblock was introduced into busybox relatively long ago: 1 July 2018 -- BusyBox 1.29.0 (unstable) Nicholas Clark: dd: add 'fullblock' iflag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at busybox.net Mon Sep 25 06:21:22 2023 From: bugzilla at busybox.net (bugzilla at busybox.net) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 06:21:22 +0000 Subject: [Bug 15751] `time` function reports more `maxrss` usage than GNU time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=15751 herano1999 at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |critical Priority|P3 |P1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.