[PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

[Laszlo Papp]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen at iki.fi>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:35:46PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Not quite sure what you are trying to achieve, but you wrote embedded
> > systems _word-by-word_, and I asked for one typical example with more
> than
> > 64 cores where busybox is so much needed.
>
> I'm not trying the limit busybox usage, and I don't think there are
> any "typical" embedded system. And Apple or Samsung are definitely not
> any reference. But if you are happy with their HW, then good for you.
>

Right, so you cannot bring up any valid and real use case for this, or do
not want despite the explicit clarification request, I take it. I do not
think theoretical changes should be added just because it is a good
technical challange. Valid use cases oughta be part of the commit message,
but at worst, comment explanation without even explicit request to be fair.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20140811/9cdec41a/attachment-0001.html>