hush: first pass at heredocs

[Mike Frysinger]

On Tuesday 07 April 2009 16:06:58 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 08:10, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 06 April 2009 22:38:42 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > On Monday 30 March 2009 12:01, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > i doubt you'll like it, but it seems to be fairly usable atm ...
> > >
> > > Thanks, I tweaked your patch and added heredoc support to svn.
> >
> > i think something was lost in translation.  i had a pathological test
> > case locally that i was using and it seems to not work at all with stuff
> > in svn. i've added it as heredoc2 so you can see what i mean.
> >
> > > BTW, NOMMU hush passes ALL testsuite entries since
> > > few days ago, and I intend to keep it this way.
> > > (Take a look how it achieves that feat)
> >
> > doesnt seem to for me ... i basically did `make allnoconfig`, then turned
> > on hush and all of its features and forced a nommu build.
> > hush-parsing-escape1.tests.fail
> > hush-parsing-escape3.tests.fail
> > hush-parsing-negate.tests.fail
> > hush-psubst-tick3.tests.fail
>
> These need FANCY_ECHO on, and that neds this patch:

how about we convert the tests to printf ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20090407/c70737bd/attachment.pgp>