[PATCH] support for -w in seq

[Bernhard Reutner-Fischer]

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:51:49PM +0100, Ralf Friedl wrote:
>Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> coreutils prints a final '\n', yes.
>coreutils prints a final '\n', but this is '\n' and not the separator.

heh, that's why i said '\n' and not "separator" ;)

So a simple bb_putchar('\n') after the while would correct this for
that 02 patchlet. Still, this would add ~127b for these two features
which sounds a tad too much (I'd attempt <= 110 for both).
Any takers?