[PATCH] nohup behaviour differs slightly from coreutils nohup
Christoph Gysin
christoph.gysin at gmail.com
Thu Jan 31 22:00:58 PST 2008
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>
> hm. I'm pretty sure that we mached coreutils behaviour at one time (when
> i last touched nohup). I did not really test it thoroughly, but i have
> the impression that my
> $ nohup --version
> nohup (GNU coreutils) 5.97
> behaves like what was implemented back then. Perhaps you can check
> against that version, too (both the pristine busybox version as well as
> your new coreutils version)?
Thanks for your reply. I just compared my test with coreutils-5.97, the
results are identical as coreutils-6.9. Maybe you wrote the inital
version against an even older version?
By "pristine busybox version" you mean busybox-1.9.0 without my patch
applied? That's what I tested with in the first place.
Christoph
More information about the busybox
mailing list