RFC: remove lash?

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 07:43:39PM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> > >  It could make sense to remove hush if msh is a little bigger than
> > > hush and maintain lash in order to have a very very small shell for
> > > very tiny devices.
> > 
> > This will leave me without shell which is small enough to be understndable
> > by mere mortals yet capable of some advanced stuff (like if/then).
>
>wasn't rob working on a new shell?  did he make it available
>anywhere?  i only ask because it might be at least as capable as
>lash at this point.

see shells/bbsh.c

Will need an indent and could use the patch that i sent to the list ages
ago to make it a bit smaller and fix a glitch or two.

Ideally, hush should be tweaked to allow for just the very, very basic
duty of a shell, with if/else, case, etc being config options, at least
from my POV. Once this is done, rm bbsh and lash, i suppose.