Probably a bug in ash

[walter harms]

Hi seb,
yes the mail was received but noone had time sofar to investigate the problem

re,
 wh


Seb wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Sorry to insist, but as I don't see any reaction to my precedent mail,
> I'd just want to know if it wasn't well delivered on the list or
> if it's just an (uninteresting|desperated) case so that there is nothing
> to say. :)
> 
> Le Thu, 28 Jun 2007 16:34:39 +0200
> Seb <sbb at tuxfamily.org> a écrit:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> It seems that there is a bug in the 'jobs' built-in command of ash. As
>> a matter of fact, its output cannot be captured nor piped.
>>
>> I made a little script (in attachment) which shows the case. If you
>> execute it with ash, you should see that 'test3' doesn't return
>> anything but a new line, while 'test4' indicates that the output is well
>> directed to stdout (so, according to the rules of shell, the pipe
>> should work).
>>
>> [...]
> 
> ++
> Seb.
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox at busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
> 
> 
>