[patch] coreutils/expr.c is this acceptable

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

On Sun, 1 Jul 2007, Denis Vlasenko wrote:

> Do you mean that your gcc emits bogus warning for l too?

Yes.

> This is better (no actual code generated:
>
> 	VALUE *l = l; /* silence gcc */
> 	VALUE *v = v; /* silence gcc */

It's fine with me, as long as it makes gcc shut up (which it does).


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian