LFS vs 64bit arches

Fri Jan 26 03:22:20 PST 2007

On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:07:30AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>after seeing the readahead depending on LFS, i have to wonder without looking 
>at any code ... are we handling LFS properly for 64bit arches ?  which is to 
>say, it doesnt really make sense to have LFS disabled for 64bit arches ...

Depends, i'd say (without having looked at actual numbers of size
increase):
If you do not need LFS, why have it turned on, even for a > 32bit arch?