svn commit: trunk/busybox

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 02:07:49AM +0100, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:53:41AM +0100, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>>On Tuesday 23 January 2007 01:40, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 11:59:23PM +0100, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
>>> >On Monday 22 January 2007 18:50, aldot at busybox.net wrote:
>>> >> Author: aldot
>>> >> Date: 2007-01-22 09:50:21 -0800 (Mon, 22 Jan 2007)
>>> >> New Revision: 17468
>>> >> 
>>> >> Log:
>>> >> - add more strict prototype checking to catch wrong and broken code (like nested functions)
>
>>But what if I cannot convert nested function into non-nestet
>>without major changes?
>
>Nested functions are ugly and are not supported by all C compilers (i
>know that we are using more and more C99 features as time passes on)

[snip fix it]

>>IOW: can we use nested functions without warnings?
>
>We can't, no. And i think that this is a feature, don't have the
>standard at hand, though, so that's a wild guess.
>
>Just my 2 cents..

It's here now at my finger's tip, but i have to get some sleep now.
Please be so kind and verify yourself (if in doubt, remove them).