ip route problem

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 06:28:34PM +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 05:11:37PM +0200, Jean Wolter wrote:
>>Jean Wolter <jw5 at os.inf.tu-dresden.de> writes:
>>
>>> busybox ip and the original ip utility behave differently when setting
>>> the following route (verified with ip route show using the original ip
>>> utility):
>>>
>>>    ip route add 10.0.0.138 dev eth0
>>
>>In the meantime someone changed libiproute/iproute.c in the busybox
>>repository without considering the patch attached to my previous
>>mail. Should I provide a patch against the repository or is this a non
>>issue?
>
>Merged, thanks.
>
>I'm now de-bloating iproute a little bit.. Would be awesome if you could
>test it afterwards, TIA

Mind testing the attached, yet incomplete touch-up of iproute.c?
Still way to go.. will follow-up during the next days.
Thanks

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
   6779       0       4    6783    1a7f iproute.o.attached
   6816       0       4    6820    1aa4 iproute.o.r18400
   6907       0       4    6911    1aff iproute.o.r18401

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bb.iproute-shrinkage.00.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 8472 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/attachments/20070411/a2eda423/attachment.bin