minimal requirements for build C compiler?

Jason Schoon floydpink at gmail.com
Thu May 25 20:05:55 PDT 2006


On 5/25/06, Andre <armcc2000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Friday 19 May 2006 17:08, Rob Landley wrote:
> > >
> > > Yup.  We went to c99 in 1.1.1, when we dropped support for gcc
> > > 2.95.
> >
> > not to dig up the previous thread, but you're willing to drop
> > support for software released in 2001 (gcc-2.95.3) but not software
> > released in 2000 (make-3.79.1) ?
>
> We've dropped support for software released in 2005 (gcc-3.4.4
> targetting ARM), so it's probably best not to try to rationalise
> Rob's decision making process... ;-)
>
> Andre


Since this is not threaded with the previous conversation, how is ARM built
with gcc-3.4.4 broken?  I currently use gcc-3.4.4 and may be targeting an
ARM platform soon, so if there are issues, I would like to get them
resolved.  Is this actually dropped support, or just a bug that exists?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/attachments/20060525/625a56f1/attachment.html


More information about the busybox mailing list