Question about mount

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:37:24PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Wednesday 29 March 2006 11:14 am, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 10:49:38AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
>> >On Wednesday 29 March 2006 2:04 am, Alexander Griesser wrote:
>> >
>> >P.S.  Is it just me, or are we having serious number trouble with these
>> >releases?  1.00, 1.01, 1.1.0, 1.1.1, 1.1.1.1...  I mean, I know ones and
>> >zeroes are great and all, but we've _got_ to stick a 2 in there
>> > eventually...
>>
>> As said here (http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/2006-March/019846.html),
>> please let's not do 1.1.1.1, but bump the patchlevel: 1.1.x
>>
>> In june, for the upcoming next minor stable release, we'd then have
>> 1.2.x and so on, ok?
>
>Sounds reasonable.  How long should fixes accumulate first, though?

Not sure. From my POV, it wouldn't hurt to push out (and announce,
*hint* ;) a 1.1.2 sometimes during the first or second (full) week
in April, i.e. in 4 to 10 days or the like.