mkfd.msdos
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Wed Mar 15 17:54:40 UTC 2006
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 11:50 am, Jason Schoon wrote:
> I once posted a patch to add mkdosfs to Busybox as mkfs.msdos. Later there
> was some cleanup needed on it, and no longer having a device to support
> that used it, I just didn't have the ambition to work with it any longer.
> Plus the code was fairly ugly, and it really just needed to be cleanly
> rewritten.
Do you have a link? I'll throw it on the TODO heap.
> This reminds me of something I wanted to bring up a while back. There is a
> contributing.txt in the docs directory of Busybox. It spells out several
> examples of things that Busybox does not need. The first two listed are no
> longer valid, since they say fdisk is not welcome, nor are filesystem
> manipulation tools (i.e. mkdosfs or ext2).
Heh. Yeah, that sounds a bit out of date.
> The fifth point spells out not
> including servers, specifically httpd, which we of course have as well.
I'm not convinced adding httpd was a good idea, and we definitely don't want
dropbear (cool as it is). We need to make some sort of policy decisions at
some point, which will probably come after a menu reorganization where we
audit what it is we've got...
> Probably ought to either eliminate the document altogether, or give it a
> good cleaning.
Agreed.
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list