busybox.h vs libbb.h

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday 31 March 2006 20:19, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Friday 31 March 2006 8:11 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 31 March 2006 19:25, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Friday 31 March 2006 5:58 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > On Friday 31 March 2006 17:40, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > > > > I want to move the buffer allocation schemes from busybox.h to
> > > > > libbb.h.
> > > >
> > > > did we ever reach a consensus as to what should be using busybox.h /
> > > > libbb.h ?
> > >
> > > The original idea was that applets should include busybox.h, and
> > > library code in libbb should include libbb.h.
> >
> > you say "original" ... that implies that current behavior does not and
> > maybe should not match this ...
>
> No, just that it may have drifted a bit over time.  For example, his
> proposed checkin is switching several libbb files from busybox.h to
> libbb.h, which goes back towards the original idea.

can we pick one ?  it'd be trivial to update the build tests to check for this
-mike