[patch] size optimization for setarch.c, fix personality applet-alias

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Tue Mar 21 08:00:44 PST 2006


On Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:44, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 20 March 2006 11:18 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 March 2006 21:28, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > 1) Is anyone ever likely to want one without the other?
> >
> > "linux32" and "linux64" is what everyone is used to ... "setarch" is the
> > new redhat "standard" but it's pretty split 50/50 in terms of what
> > distros use what ... so a lot of scripts still execute `linux32`
>
> Actually I meant is anyone going to want linux32 without linux64, or vice
> versa.  I removed the symbols anyway since they weren't being used.

not really
-mike


More information about the busybox mailing list