svn 14566

[Mihai Buha]

> From: Rob Landley
> Does changing the order really making a difference?  Are you 
> saying that "if 
> (x=5 && 0)" _won't_ optimize out?  (If the first thing is a 
> function call 
> that might have a side effect, I could see it.  But x && 0 
> not optimizing out 
> is a bug in the compiler.  Have you actually _seen_ this bug?

Not sure if this bug has been seen. I didn't even looked up
svn 14566. But to call "buggy" a compiler that simply follows the
operator associativity rules as set by the C standard, looks to
me like an exaggeration...

> Rob
Mihai Buha
This e-mail (including any attachments to it) is confidential, proprietary, legally privileged, subject to copyright and is sent for the personal attention of the intended recipient only. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to advise us immediately, delete it and destroy any printed copies of it. You are notified that reading, disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. No employee is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of NIVIS LLC with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of the company. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail, we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the viruses in this e-mail or attachments.