svn 14468

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 09 March 2006 12:48 pm, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 09 March 2006 12:46 pm, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Ok, I'll ask.
> >
> > What's the advantage of running the busybox version of all these e2fs
> > programs over just running the external package we just
> > _resynced_against_?
> >
> > Rob
>
> P.S
>
>  CC e2fsprogs/ext2fs/ext2fs_inline.o
> /home/landley/busybox/busybox/e2fsprogs/ext2fs/ext2fs_inline.c: In function
> ‘ext2fs_resize_mem’:
> /home/landley/busybox/busybox/e2fsprogs/ext2fs/ext2fs_inline.c:50: warning:
> implicit declaration of function ‘memcpy’
> /home/landley/busybox/busybox/e2fsprogs/ext2fs/ext2fs_inline.c:50: warning:
> incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘memcpy’
>
> *grumble*
>
> Rob

P.P.S.

 CC e2fsprogs/blkid/probe.o
/home/landley/busybox/busybox/e2fsprogs/blkid/probe.c:489: warning: 
initialization from incompatible pointer type
/home/landley/busybox/busybox/e2fsprogs/blkid/probe.c:490: warning: 
initialization from incompatible pointer type
/home/landley/busybox/busybox/e2fsprogs/blkid/probe.c:509: warning: 
initialization from incompatible pointer type

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.