[PATCH] Re: Sigh... Bumping the sed nul fix to 1.1.2.

[Roberto A. Foglietta]

Rob Landley wrote:

> 
> Is the current code passing the "sed NUL in command" test?  (How?)

  PATCH n9: currently \0 are not allowed in the command line

PASS: sed embedded NUL
PASS: sed embedded NUL g
sed: Unsupported command o
FAIL: sed NUL in command

  Please consider that \0 in command line is completely another thing 
than \0 in the strings. Actually I have to prepare some exams so I will 
not be back on sed before 15gg. I would consider this patch the last 
about \0 in the strings.

  How can be allerted when some sed stuff are modified in SVN?


  Cheers,
-- 
Roberto A. Foglietta
http://roberto.foglietta.name
http://linux.genova.it
skype: robang74
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: busybox.14453_sed9.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 4319 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/attachments/20060306/93fbec47/busybox.14453_sed9.bin