dual licensing for libbusybox

[Mike Frysinger]

with support being added for a shared busybox library, there is the "small" 
issue of the new libbusybox being under the GPL ... i'm not sure if this is 
intended, and if it is, then this thread can die now :)

i dont think it'd be such a bad idea keeping busybox source under the GPL, but 
allowing people to link against libbusybox itself in a LGPL style ... 
thoughts ?
-mike