[PATCH] restructure struct initialization aesthetically

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Tue Jun 20 14:25:03 PDT 2006


On Tuesday 20 June 2006 12:47 pm, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:52:35AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> > >On Tuesday 20 June 2006 11:17 am, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > >>   just to make a couple struct initializations easier to read.
> > >>
> > >> rday
> > >
> > >Applied.
> >
> > Does this mean that trunk is reopened for random cleanup and random
> > shrinkage and that the bugfixes only phase is over?
> >
> > Just curious..
>
> i wasn't sure what was and wasn't acceptable at this point, but i'm
> trying to keep my submissions aesthetic in most cases, just to make it
> easier for me to read the code.
>
> if even fixes like that are out-of-bounds, let me know.
>
> rday
>
> p.s.  given that we're using subversion, can't we have an
> upcoming-1.2.0 branch, as well as an ongoing development trunk and
> just merge after 1.2.0 is released?

Subversion doesn't make merges any easier than CVS does.  Feel free to create 
all the branches you want, but I'm going to ignore them because they make my 
life harder, not easier.

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.


More information about the busybox mailing list