[PATCH] LDFLAGS configuration

[Bernhard Fischer]

On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 11:26:42AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
>On Thursday 08 June 2006 6:22 pm, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>> On 6/8/06, Shaun Jackman <sjackman at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I agree. I'd also like to see CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX renamed to
>> > CROSS_COMPILE, as Linux names it. It makes sense to do it at the same
>> > time it's remove from .config.
>>
>> I just noticed that although the config option was named
>> CROSS_COMPILER_PREFIX, the make variable was named CROSS. So, do the
>> maintainers prefer to keep the make variable named CROSS, or switch to
>> the Linux name, CROSS_COMPILE? I can see benefits to both, but we
>> should pick one definitively.
>
>Go with CROSS_COMPILE.  You only have to build three things for a minimal 
>embedded system: the Linux Kernel, uClibc, and BusyBox.  It would be nice if 
>they all worked roughly the same way...

Yes indeed (mainly taking me out of the CC for this thread).