strangeness involving e2fsprogs header files
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Wed Jul 5 08:24:36 PDT 2006
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 12:32 am, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > A) Either the standard #include files should work, or we shouldn't be
> > using those names.
>
> the standard includes might work if they're from the same version, but we
> cant really rely on that
All we should need are the on-disk structures.
> > B) The point of #include "" instead of #include <> is that it searches
> > local directories first. This was in C89 let alone C99. Are you saying
> > the build for this directory is so screwed up that doesn't work reliably?
>
> do you really need me to copy and past the e-mails ive already sent ?
No, I just need to yank this code.
> -mike
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.
More information about the busybox
mailing list