Static binary (no shared libs) fails in Busybox 1.3.0 ?

[Ashwin Bihari]

On 12/18/06, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal.cx> wrote:
>
> glibc authors have intentionally not supported static linking for a
> long time. If you want static linking, use a different libc that
> properly supports it.
>
> Rich
>
>
I use BuildRoot which uses uClibc and generates a usable statically linked
Busybox. You might want to look into that as opposed to Glibc (which is too
big anyway)

-- 
~ Ashwin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://busybox.net/lists/busybox/attachments/20061218/86528ecb/attachment.htm