init not processing SIGCHLD during reboot?

[Rob Landley]

On Saturday 02 December 2006 6:02 pm, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 17:04 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> 
> > So you say that behavior required by SUSv3 isn't something you're willing 
to 
> > rely on, yet BusyBox has been targeting susv3 for how many years now?  
(The 
> > austin group was when?)
> 
> I've been subscribed to this mailing list for about 27 hours now.  I
> have no idea whether BusyBox targets SUSv3, much less how long it has
> done so.  I'm perfectly happy to rely on it if that's the project's
> standard.  Many free software projects take a much more lax position on
> OS requirements.

I wrote this during my tenure as maintainer, which is now over:

http://busybox.net/FAQ.html#standards

What Denis decides to do is up to him (it's his baby now), but last I checked 
he was still ok with that.

Rob
-- 
"Perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery