alternative decodeString() for httpd.c
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at mindspring.com
Mon Apr 17 09:22:45 UTC 2006
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Vladimir N. Oleynik wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > given that the current implementation of decodeString() in
> > httpd.c seems to have an error,
>
> Not. If you do not know, the code what for it to name a "error" what
> for has been specially added?
i have no idea what this means. in an earlier post, i described what
i thought was some odd behaviour based on the current implementation
of decodeString() in httpd.c. specifically,
$ httpd -d "abc"
abc OK
$ httpd -d "abc/"
abc/ also OK
$ httpd -d "abc%2f"
bc%2f ??????
why did the leading "a" disappear? and why was that trailing "/" not
decoded? perhaps this is what it's *supposed* to do but it just looks
strange to me. feel free to explain what's happening here if you
know.
> What for you have removed mine standalone a debugging code? To
> deprive with me an opportunity to support with my code?
the proposal to remove the STANDALONE feature in httpd.c was discussed
for *days* on this list. it would have been nice if you'd said
something before now.
rday
More information about the busybox
mailing list