[BusyBox] udhcp patches/ endianess

[Eric Lammerts]

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Rainer Weikusat wrote:
> Eh ... first, this is the original algorithm, not the version that has
> been modified by me. Due to the fact that the sum is
> endian-independant (cf the relevant RFCs), it's pointless to swap the
> bytes here.

ok, I obviously didn't read the RFC first...
But the added config option is still totally unnecessary. The
necessary define already exists (__BYTE_ORDER).

And why is pad_octet_left() there??
And why does pad_octet_right() take a 'pad' argument when it's always
zero anyway?

Eric