[BusyBox] Re: [uClinux-dev] busybox 'ls'

[John Williams]

Erik Andersen wrote:

 > DavidM wrote:

>>Otherwise, if I didn't know better I would say it was a mismatch
>>between the directory structure from kernel and uClibc, and perhaps
>>lash is including the wrong headers or using a different method for
>>walking the directories,
> 
> 
> I suppose the microblaze uClibc port could have such a bug.
> There havn't been any uClibc problems of this sort for quite 
> a long while now.  

I'll do some digging - it's not a big deal right now, I was just testing 
to see how much of busybox I could get going on the microblaze.  The 
answer is "most of it", although there is this issue with 'ls' that I'll 
sort out one day.

Thanks,

John