[BusyBox] warning in uniq_main() !?

[Steven Scholz]

Philip Blundell wrote:

> On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 11:33, Steven Scholz wrote:
> 
>>-       unsigned long dups, skip_fields, skip_chars, i;
>>-       const char *s0, *e0, *s1, *e1, *input_filename;
>>+       unsigned long dups=0, skip_fields, skip_chars, i;
>>+       const char *s0, *e0=NULL, *s1, *e1, *input_filename;
> 
> 
> Adding an initialiser to a local variable will probably increase the
> code size.  Since that value is never actually used, any extra
> instructions that are added this way would just be wasting space.

Hmm. So adding unessesary warnings would be better than adding one or two bytes?

Steven