[BusyBox] Question regarding Minix FS
Geoffrey Espin
espin at idiom.com
Thu Feb 28 09:43:04 UTC 2002
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 08:42:34AM +0100, Axel Kittenberger wrote:
> > I believe the most common strategy is to use cramfs with shmfs
> > (for writeable but temporary/volatile storage). Then I added
> > JFFS2 support for the permanent storage.
> Hmmm, what has cramfs for advantages/disadvantages against minix?
I've not used minix fs... but assume one would need a block level
driver on top of flash. In which case, MTD+JFFS2, is the premier
solution. Bootstrapping via a ramdisk is a simple, practical
strategy, with cramfs being the most compact way, although readonly.
Geoff
--
Geoffrey Espin
espin at idiom.com
--
More information about the busybox
mailing list