[BusyBox] Re: Last busybox documentation update

[Mark Allen]

Erik Andersen wrote:
> 
> On Fri Jul 07, 2000 at 02:12:33PM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> >
> > I plan on just using the full blown one from util-linux.  Anything else is
> > going to just cause grief I suspect.  I have already started working on getting
> > this merged in.
> 
> Hmm.  The more I poke at this, the more I suspect that perhaps fdisk
> shouldn't live in busybox at all.

sfdisk is a far more useful program to me personally -- anything that's
broken in it should be fixed. Anything that avoids interactivity is a
good thing for our purposes. The standard Linux fdisk is great, but
can't be scripted with anything but expect, and I doubt we could wedge
expect into busybox.

And second, good work Matt on the patch for #1003. I was going to cook
one up this morning. Some other bug will be mine to kill... ;-)

Third, I've been compiling busybox with 2.2.16 kernel source just fine.
I saw someone else was having some kind of problem. I wonder what the
differences between my environment and his could be?

Regards,

Mark

--
mallen at tuxtops.com
http://www.tuxtops.com
Tuxtops: the Linux on Laptops company