No subject

before you create it!"

I undoubtedly can fix bbox cp to match GNU message, but code will be
bigger
and GNU message is still semi-stupid.

For the record: fix should be here:

static int ask_and_unlink(const char *dest, int flags)
{
        ...
        if (unlink(dest) < 0) {

===> if errno == ENOENT or ENOTDIR, explain that *path* is invalid, not
filename <===

                bb_perror_msg("cannot remove '%s'", dest);
                return -1; // error
        }
        return 1; // ok (to try again)
} 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 kiltedknight - 08-24-07 08:58  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've read it again.  You don't seem to understand...

If the path in which you want to create the file does not exist, you
should never see EEXIST... that implies the file already exists! 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 vda - 08-24-07 09:55  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
bbox cp says:

cp: cannot remove '/tmp/nonexistent/path/foo': No such file or directory

which sounds stupid

GNU coreutils cp says:

cp: cannot create regular file `/tmp/nonexistent/path/foo': No such file
or directory

which is also stupid.

Do you agree with me on the above?

If yes: then why we should change from one stupid message to another
stupid one?
If no: explain why do you think that coreutils message is better. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
08-23-07 10:55  kiltedknight   New Issue                                    
08-23-07 10:55  kiltedknight   Status                   new => assigned     
08-23-07 10:55  kiltedknight   Assigned To               => BusyBox         
08-23-07 10:55  kiltedknight   File Added: bb_cp_errmsg_fix.diff                
   
08-23-07 10:55  kiltedknight   Issue Monitored: kiltedknight                    
08-24-07 07:22  vda            Status                   assigned => closed  
08-24-07 07:22  vda            Note Added: 0002681                          
08-24-07 07:22  vda            Resolution               open => won't fix   
08-24-07 08:58  kiltedknight   Status                   closed => feedback  
08-24-07 08:58  kiltedknight   Resolution               won't fix => reopened
08-24-07 08:58  kiltedknight   Note Added: 0002682                          
08-24-07 09:55  vda            Note Added: 0002683                          
======================================================================